Hwang Ui-jo's "molka" leaker criticized for choosing to "sleep" with a womanizer without being "exclusive"

Article: "Gaslighting? You were the one enjoying s*x with Hwang Ui-jo.." fierce criticism from politicians

Source: E Daily

Hwang Ui-jo's "molka" leaker A is facing fierce criticism after leaking his nudes.

On the 27th, former spokesperson Moon Seong-ho shared a post on his Facebook about leaker A who exposed Hwang Ui-jo's private life and stated, "This Hwang Ui-jo case where he got his personal life leaked is seriously telling. To put it briefly, Hwang Ui-jo had sex with a number of women without establishing a romantic relationship and one of those women was A. This is a case of a scorned woman stealing a player's cell phone and exposing his private life threatening to expose his nudes and molka."

"If the problem is that Hwang Ui-jo didn't establish a relationship, why did the exposer have sex with a man she wasn't exclusive with? If you wanted to be lovers with Hwang Ui-jo, shouldn't you have asked whether he was planning on dating you or not?? How were you gaslighted? What a ridiculous excuse unless you were a minor."

"I strongly support women exercising their right to sexual freedom but at the same time what I hate the most is putting responsibilities on a man you freely chose to have sex with. This is nothing more than a childish tantrum to pass the blame onto another person just because your relationship didn't rise to the level you expected or wanted after freely consenting to have sex. You could've chosen not to have sex if he wasn't going to be exclusive, did you even ask? It's absurd to criticize him afterwards when you were the one enjoying s*x with Hwang Ui-jo."

"If this was the other way around and you had a one-night stand and the guy acted like a boyfriend and forced you into a relationship, wouldn't that be creepy??"

On the same day, Rep. Eun-ah also posted on her Facebook and argued, "It's no different than the Nth Room case so strict legal standards are needed."

Meanwhile, Hwang Ui-jo's lawyer filed a complaint with the Seongdong Police Station in Seoul for defamation and intimidation. His lawyer stated, "We submitted 5 Instagram accounts that sent threatening messages and wrote posts about the leaks. Hwang Ui-jo's phone was stolen in October last year and after that, 2 months ago, he received a call threatening him saying, "if he didn't do what he was told, they would leak out his private pictures." The leaked video being circulated around is causing secondary and tertiary damage. We will monitor the damage and take action against those who are spreading the post."

1. [+5,241, -167] Whether he's a virgin bachelor or not, the point is what he filmed. Let's not cloud that with other things.
2. [+2,042, -66] There's no issue if there was mutual consent to s*x, but did he get permission from everyone involved in the molka s*x tapes?? If not, then it's a crime!
3. [+1,550, -81] If it's a hidden camera, isn't he another Jung Joon Young?! No one will say anything if there was mutual consent to film but if it's a hidden cam then it's an issue. He's not married, he can be a womanizer and sleep around with whoever he wants at the same time.. but he has a moral responsibility. Since when did our country become so tolerant of 8-legged womanizers?!
4. [+1,031, -198] If she's so confident, she should expose her face and explain things properly!
5. [+474, -17] Yes, the woman isn't right for this either but is this something politicians should be stepping out to comment on? Look after the well-being of your people first! Looking at this, it's clear you're not listening to your people and all the bills are being thrown to the back burner!
6. [+302, -12] Eh, why are politicians putting out comments on things that haven't been clarified yet?? This is a bit careless no?
7. [+220, -11] Young kids can be like that nowadays.. isn't the core of the issue why he filmed that and had it on his phone in the first place?? Stop blurring the key issue!!
8. [+204, -8] Bachelors are womanizers and sleep around yes.. but if he's filming molka without consent he needs to be arrested!!
9. [+193, -16] Both the man and the woman can be at fault but it's a bit uncomfortable watching politicians trying to protect a player womanizer like this? Catch the leaker and check the contents inside the phone!! If both of them did illegal things then they both deserve punishment.
10. [+166, -5] The key points in the case; 1. Did Hwang Ui-jo illegally film molka and keep the videos? 2. Leaker who circulated it committed a crime too and should be punished.
11. [+113, -4] Well, the leaker is circulating molka of another woman and not of her own right? It's clear this is going to be a muddy fight but A shouldn't be seeing herself as some kind of public informant either... just another s*x criminal.